Pro features: OMF import/export, remote recording, etc.Īll this is to say that Cubase sales are not the result of marketing gimmicks. You can do this in Reaper but it's a manual process.Ĭontent: Cubase comes with a whole suite of great sounding (and great looking) plugins, along with a powerful sampler, a few nice synths, and some other goodies. No way to do that in reaper.Īutomatic tempo mapping: Cubase can automatically create a tempo map from a track, allowing you to get a click track for a live performance, say. Among other things, it has a graphical EQ visible for every track in its mixer, which makes it easy to see cuts and boosts across your entire project at a glance. This is great for experimentation without duplicating tracks (increase CPU load, complicating your project, etc.)Ĭhannel strip: Cubase has real channel strip built-in to every track, with an EQ, gate, compressor, limiter, tape saturation, etc. Track versions: Cubase tracks can have an arbitrary number of versions that you can easily switch between. Reaper + Melodyne with ARA2 might be as good or better, but the workflow will probably never be quite as good as having it directly integrated into the DAW. VariAudio: Cubase lets you manipulate notes and pitch as if it was MIDI data, much like Melodyne. chord pads), but some of them are genuinely useful. Some of them are gimmicky and/or not of use to people who actually write their own music (e.g. I recently switched from Cubase Pro to Reaper, after using Cubase for a decade.Ĭubase is pretty packed with features and contains quite a few things that Reaper lacks. Since my budget isn't an issue, what are the main advantages Cubase has over Reaper? Or its a marketing trick?īudget isn't an issue for me, either.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |